We were given a project to create a one minute film about a title which was given to us: Cardboard Kremlin. We therefore decided to create a big kremlin out of cardboard. We had limitation since our funds weren't high we had to look for an empty space with a lock for free. Fortunately we managed to get a space in Elephant and Castle shopping centre for free however we only had the space for two days.
We tried to do the biggest kremlin cardboard in two days.
http://vimeo.com/24987592
Monday, 30 January 2012
Friday, 27 January 2012
Irony
-Irony is applied when there is a contradiction
- Postmodernist believe that beauty and aesthetics is subjective to individuals, they are liberal, unlike modernist, which are conservative: has a set idea of what Art is.
- If Beauty and truth doesn’t exist then what is art for postmodernists? if art can no longer be judged on culturally- constructed ideas of beauty, what is left?
-Irony is the most valued thing in Art to postmodernists; they believe that it is a primary mode of expression. Postmodernist want to shock and mock, go against the dominating culture.
- Modernism has only one way of seeing art, which only speaks to the higher classes, the educated ones. They understand the irony and find it attractive. But the majority of us can agree that a dot on a white canvas bores us to death
- Postmodernism instead pushes the individual to question their assumptions about what art is. (Who, what, how its received). Irony in postmodernism erases the difference between high and low culture.
-However: Postmodernist critics have discussed that if
Piss Christ by Serrano
- Crucifixes in urine and menstrual fluids in beakers nailed to a wall are passing as art
Fountain by Duchamp
- Urinal made as a fountain
Postmodernists believe that Piss Christ and Fountain is Art
They can only be considered art if you believe that irony and irony alone is “beautiful” otherwise it is merely social commentary in visual form
Philosophy : The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction
The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction by Benjamin Walter declares that there is a shift in perception and its affects in the wake of the advent of film and photography in the 20th century. In the modern age, reproduction of art takes a very important role. Benjamin throughout the text demonstrates that the reproduction of the artwork loses its aura, which is the authenticity of an original art piece. The installation of Photography tries to persuade the opposite of Benjamin’s thesis by challenging the use of photography to capture and express the aura of The Burgher de Calais by Rodin in Westminster Park. When visiting the Statue, I perceived the aura as very mysterious, sinister and empowering. Benjamin emphasizes the importance of the space in which the art exists as a key contributor to it's aura. By presenting multiple photographs I was able to present the ambience of the environment accurately which helped to convey the aura of the statue in regards to its' surroundings.
Photography was chosen, as it seemed like the best way to capture this aura; it is one of the media, which manages to provide an exact replica. In addition, the idea of having a fixed image allows the viewers to take their time to discover and appreciate all the elements of the picture. The six images each contain different angles of the statue, starting from far to very close. The viewer is therefore forced to move focus from one image to the other thus, creating a sense of movement towards the statue. This was intentionally made in order to coerce the viewer in experiencing the same feeling as if they were at the actual place. Five of the images surrounds a single picture which is larger in size as it portraits perfectly the moment: the child running around the dark and chaotic statue, the gothic building and the dead trees; yet he is staring right at the camera making the picture look quite haunting.
This artwork shows that the aura of a piece of work can be reproduced through the use of photography. However it has a certain limitation as it can only provide the aura of that exact time when the picture was taken whereas the original artwork can provide a range of different auras according to the change of the environment. Meaning that the original piece of art provides more then a photograph can possibly provide. However, with the easy access of images, the photograph then takes a part in the change of its aura as it makes the statue more known hence the change of environment.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)